Just
after 15 months on the job, Saudi Ambassador to the US Turki Al-Faisal resigned
unexpectedly from his post and flew back to Riyadh. The
Washington
Post article is indicating that the reason for this sudden departure could be that
he wants to spend more with his family, specifically with his ailing brother, Saudi Foreign Minister, Saud Al-Faisal.
Seriously,
anyone buys that?
Booman speculates:
It could be that Saud al-Faisal is seriously ill and that Turki
al-Faisal is going to take over as foreign minister. It could indicate severe
tensions in the U.S./Saudi relationship. It is highly suspicious that Turki
would choose such a critical time to go home. Bush is planning on rolling out
his new Iraq
strategy sometime before Christmas. In my analysis, that means
right now is the time to for the Saudis to use all their influence to guide
Bush's decisions.
Perhaps they have determined that Bush's strategy is
fundamentally incompatible with their interests. Perhaps this is their way of
showing thier displeasure.
On the other hand, maybe Turki has worn out his welcome here, or
our intelligence agencies have discovered something ugly, like Faisal has been working
with terrorists (here, or in Iraq).
Rasheed,
on the other hand, thinks that this has to do with the now infamous Washington
Post article written by Nawaf Obaid:
I think Prince Turki has taken the fall for
the article that his protege Nawaf Obaid printed in
the Washington Post last week which claimed Saudi Arabia was ready to step
in and provide monetary, military and political support to Iraq's besieged Sunni
minority if the US pulled out of Iraq. This plan was
denied by Saudi Arabiathe next day and Obaid was then fired from his post as consultant to Turki.
I don't think that Obaid would have ever written that Post piece without the
explicit green light from Turki. I think they were just testing the waters to
see what the public and Iraqi reaction would be. Iraqi Prime Minsiter Nur
Al-Malki immediately denounced the idea, saying that the Kingdom supported a
united Iraq, and by implication would not allow the
country to be dismembered into Sunni, Shia and Kurd areas.
I think
that Bomman's last suggestion is highly unlikely since Al-Faisal family’s stance on
terrorism and their support for strong ties with the US is known. And with regard to Saud Al-Faisal being sick,
then Turki could’ve just taken off for few weeks without having to resign,
unless he already got the news about the death of his brother and will have to immediately
fill his place. The few next days will clarify this issue.
Update December 13: the New York Times may have better insight.
Recent Comments